合作客戶/
拜耳公司 |
同濟大學 |
聯(lián)合大學 |
美國保潔 |
美國強生 |
瑞士羅氏 |
相關新聞Info
-
> 離子組成、pH值對納米SiO2/SDS體系降低油水界面張力的影響（一）
> 兩種烷基咪唑亞磷酸酯離子液體熱穩(wěn)定性、表面張力測定（三）
> 表面張力儀分析氣潤濕反轉(zhuǎn)劑對緩解煤層水鎖效應、解吸速率影響（二）
> ?翅果油飲品加工工藝的創(chuàng)新與深度解析界面張力儀在其中的應用
> 納米級復合降凝劑的作用機制、對含蠟原油表面張力的影響
> 多功能膜材研發(fā)：界面張力已成為整套工藝鏈協(xié)同下動態(tài)演化的核心控制點
> 表面能和表面張力關系，如何降低表面張力
> 表面活性劑對粉煤灰基多孔地聚物孔結構及性能的調(diào)控機制研究
> DHSO、AGE、TMHC構建陽離子有機硅表面活性劑DAT防水鎖性能（一）
> 不同溫度和壓力下稠油混合體系的界面張力測量結果
推薦新聞Info
-
> 浮選三相界面中的氣液界面：表面張力、藥劑分布與吉布斯方程
> 智馭毫厘：一項革新覆銅板缺陷預判的前沿技術
> 高溫熔鹽體系水分子 - 離子配位作用對界面張力影響規(guī)律
> 水分子界面富集弱化熔融氫氧化鈉表面張力的微觀本質(zhì)
> 600~900 K 熔融氫氧化鈉與水蒸氣界面特性分子動力學分析
> 水分子調(diào)控熔融氫氧化鈉表面張力微觀機理分子動力學研究
> 芬蘭Kibron表面張力儀 vs 主流品牌表面張力儀對比分析
> 6∶2氟調(diào)磺酸在飽和與非飽和土壤中的遷移行為研究
> 6∶2氟調(diào)磺酸表面活性及其在氣-水界面的吸附特性
> 基于表面張力測定量化6∶2氟調(diào)磺酸表面活性
表面活性劑是否對斥水性土壤的潤濕性有影響？——結論、致謝！
來源：上海謂載 瀏覽 2111 次 發(fā)布時間:2021-11-09
結論
不像人工創(chuàng)造的穩(wěn)定的驅(qū)蟲表面或多孔 介質(zhì)，拒水土壤表現(xiàn)出潤濕動力學，由此 最初疏水的土壤隨著時間的推移變得親水 與水接觸時。 初始潤濕動力學 排斥土壤通常歸因于 固液界面能 (γSL)，或液汽界面能 (γLV) 的降低，或兩者兼而有之。 γLV 的減少 建議是由于土壤表面溶解 活性有機化合物進入與水接觸的水中 土壤。 在這項研究中，我們測試了土傳表面的影響 潤濕動力學的活性物質(zhì)，并發(fā)現(xiàn)，與廣為接受的范式相反，土壤釋放表面 活性化合物不會加速潤濕過程。 因此很明顯，固體界面能的變化 表面（γSL 或 γSV），而不是液汽 表面 (γLV) 必須在驅(qū)動不穩(wěn)定排斥性土壤的潤濕動力學方面起主導作用。
致謝
本研究由以色列農(nóng)業(yè)部資助 和農(nóng)村發(fā)展，資助號 821-0088-04。
參考
Barrett, G. & Slaymaker, O. 1989. Identification, characterization, and hydrological implications of water repellency in mountain soils, southern British-Columbia. Catena, 16, 477–489.
Bisdom, E.B.A., Dekker, L.W. & Schoute, J.F.T. 1993. Water repellency of sieve fractions from sandy soils and relationships with organic material and soil structure. Geoderma, 56, 105–118.
Chen, Y. & Schnitzer, M. 1978. Surface-tension of aqueous-solutions of soil humic substances. Soil Science, 125, 7–15.
Dekker, L.W., Oostindie, K. & Ritsema, C.J. 2005. Exponential increase of publications related to soil water repellency. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 43, 403–441.
Dinar, E., Taraniuk, I., Graber, E.R., Katsman, S., Moise, T., Anttila, T. et al. 2006. Cloud condensation nuclei properties of model and atmospheric HULIS. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 6, 2465–2481.
Doerr, S.H., Shakesby, R.A. & Walsh, R.P.D. 2000. Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth-Science Reviews, 51, 33–65.
Doerr, S.H., Dekker, L.W., Ritsema, C.J., Shakesby, R.A. & Bryant, R. 2002. Water repellency of soils: the influence of ambient relative humidity. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 401–405.
Ellerbrock, R.H., Gerke, H.H., Bachmann, J. & Goebel, M.O. 2005. Composition of organic matter fractions for explaining wettability of three forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 57–66.
Feng, G.L., Letey, J. & Wu, L. 2002. The influence of two surfactants on infiltration into a water-repellent soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 66, 361–367.
Gee, G.W. & Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle-size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Monograph No 9 (ed. A. Klute), pp. 383–411.
American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. Graber, E.R., Ben-Arie, O. & Wallach, R. 2006. Effect of sample disturbance on soil water repellency determination in sandy soils. Geoderma, 136, 11–19.
Hurrass, J. & Schaumann, G.E. 2006. Properties of soil organic matter and aqueous extracts of actually water repellent and wettable soil samples. Geoderma, 132, 222–239.
Letey, J. 1969. Measurement of contact angle, water drop penetration time, and critical surface tension. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Water Repellent Soils 6–8 May 1968 (eds L.F. DeBano & J.F. Letey), pp. 43–47. University of California, Riverside, CA. Letey, J., Carrillo, M.L.K. & Pang, X.P. 2000. Approaches to characterize the degree of water repellency. Journal of Hydrology, 231–232, 61–65.
Ma'shum, M. & Farmer, V.C. 1985. Origin and assessment of water repellency of a sandy South Australian soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 23, 623–626.
Roy, J.L. & McGill, W.B. 2002. Assessing soil water repellency using the molarity of ethanol droplet (MED) test. Soil Science, 167, 83–97.
Tschapek, M. 1984. Criteria for determining the hydrophilicityhydrophobicity of soils. Zeitschrift fu¨r Pflanzenerna¨hrung und Bodenkunde, 147, 137–149.
Walkley, A. & Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modifi- cation of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37, 29–38. Wallach, R. & Graber, E.R. 2007. Effluent irrigation-induced soil water repellency: time dependent variation of infiltration rate and of water repellency at different levels of ambient relative humidity. Hydrological Processes, 21, 2346–2355.
Wallach, R., Ben-Arie, O. & Graber, E.R. 2005. Soil water repellency induced by long-term irrigation with treated sewage effluent. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 1910–1920.
Wallis, M.G. & Horne, D.J. 1992. Soil water repellency. Advances in Soil Science, 20, 91–140.